Alito: There's No Way To Prove These Jim Crow Electoral Maps Are Racist

The anti-constitutionalist jurists comprising a majority of the land’s highest court, working directly for corrupt billionaire benefactors and using bad-faith legal arguments to unwind the human rights gains of the 20th Century, are now telling fellow jurists to ignore all evidence of bad-faith political maneuvering and assume the nation’s radicalized, anti-democracy political party is operating in impeccably good faith. 

It’s a lot to take in, I know, but it’s exactly what happened on Thursday when John Roberts and the captured institution we call the United States Supreme Court once again saved the Republican Party by green lighting the most virulently racist electoral maps ever conceived. Texas Republicans’ Jim Crow-style gerrymander of their already-gerrymandered state – which came at the request of their increasingly sleepy and senile god-king – dilutes the electoral power of brown and black populations in ways that shocked even the Trump-appointed district judge who struck down the maps as beyond the constitutional pale. 

Become a Bad Faith Times supporter today and get access to BFT videos and the BFT discord channel. 

The fascist bat signal lit up the night sky and the Roberts Court came to the rescue, with Samuel Alito – an insurrectionist sympathizer and very clearly an enemy of the United States – swooping in to chastise the district courts and ruling that the Texas GOP could move forward with the maps designed to add upwards of six Republican House seats in 2026 (I maintain Republicans have no chance of retaining a majority, though they could reduce a massive Democratic House majority to something smaller and less likely to hold in 2028 and 2030).